Peter Singer's famous essay "Famine, Affluence, and Morality" (PDF here) argues that charity is a moral imperative. He makes a strong case. The quality of philosophical arguments against this demandingness objection are best summarized by SMBC:
I'm reminded of Godwin's The Cold Equations. Uncomfortable feelings aside, math is math. I've read disparaging sneers about utilitarian ethics, but maximizing the number of lives saved seems pretty straightforwardly good.
For a little more info on effective altruism:
GiveWell
80,000 Hours
29 June 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Review: The Raven Scholar
The Raven Scholar by Antonia Hodgson My rating: 4 of 5 stars View all my reviews

-
"She did not care for children's books in which the children grew up, as what "growing up" entailed (in life as in books)...
-
Been looking at the Asus X200 notebooks for a couple of months. I loved netbooks when they first came out, went through a few. I still thin...
-
The Princess and the Kiss: A Story of God's Gift of Purity by Jennie Bishop My rating: 1 of 5 stars ...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Word verification keep out the spambots, but comments will never be censored. Crocker's Rules. Tell me I'm an ass.