18 April 2010
serendipity
maybe serendipity is a confirmation bias, an ev psych hack to encourage exploration and experimentation. is it really true that learning naturally turns up more good than bad? or is ecclesiastes right and learning is grief and sorrow? could one set up a controlled experimental study to quantify serendipity? do i really want to know the findings? of course i do. as a duty, it's important. as frank herbert said: the open eye is better, no matter what it sees. but strangely i dread the answer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Review: The Princess and the Kiss: A Story of God's Gift of Purity
The Princess and the Kiss: A Story of God's Gift of Purity by Jennie Bishop My rating: 1 of 5 stars ...

-
Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World by Carl T. Bergstrom My rating: 2 of 5 stars ...
-
I. Input shoe size II. blah III. blah IV. blah V. blah (Arbitrary number that makes this work, but only for the year 2012) VI. Input ...
-
Been looking at the Asus X200 notebooks for a couple of months. I loved netbooks when they first came out, went through a few. I still thin...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Word verification keep out the spambots, but comments will never be censored. Crocker's Rules. Tell me I'm an ass.